January 2016
This brief describes the relationship between food insecurity and health inequities, and provides references to other reports on the topic.
The Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota provided funding to organizations through the Health Equity in Prevention initiative to advance health equity through policy, systems, and environmental changes. Wilder Research conducted a review of tools than can assess organizational capacity to advance health equity. Evaluation work included conducting ripple effect mapping discussions with HEiP-funded organizations to understand project impacts. Reports also highlight policy work and lessons learned.
This brief describes the relationship between food insecurity and health inequities, and provides references to other reports on the topic.
This report is part of the Promising Practices series, which highlights successful strategies used by organizations involved in the Health Equity in Prevention (HEiP) initiative. This portion of the series discusses the key components of effective community engagement.
Part of the Promising Practices series, this brief discusses the efforts of the Rainbow Health Initiative (RHI) to implement tobacco-free policies at Pride events in Minnesota.
This report discusses the work of the Open Door, a nonprofit organization that operates food shelves in Eagan, Lakeville, and Dakota County.
In 2013, Appetite for Change (AFC) received funding from the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota through the Health Equity in Prevention (HEiP) initiative. Through its HEiP funding, AFC developed Fresh Corners, a network of local vendors, urban gardeners, residents, and partner organizations working to improve the food system in North Minneapolis through policy, systems, and environmental changes. This document summarizes a discussion held in November 2014, when a group of 14 project stakeholders were invited to a Ripple Effect Mapping discussion about AFC�s health equity work. The discussion participants included AFC staff and representatives from Project Sweetie Pie, the Main Street Project, and West Broadway Farmers Market, along with local residents and growers. The discussion was intended to not only provide the participants a chance to consider how successful the project has been in achieving its intended goals, but also to identify the indirect or unexpected project impacts.
In 2013, the Open Door received funding from the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota through the Health Equity in Prevention (HEiP) initiative. Through its HEiP funding, the Open Door is influencing policy and legislation, changing organizational practices, and building coalitions and networks to reduce health inequities related to food. In January 2015, a group of 16 project stakeholders were invited to a Ripple Effect Mapping discussion about the Open Door’s healthy food access work. This a summary of the discussion.
Through their Fair Food Access Campaign, the Zeppa Family Foundation is using multiple strategies to improve food access in the Lincoln Park neighborhood of Duluth, including: increasing community and home gardens, building or attracting a small grocery store, establishing a farmer�s market or farm stands, creating an affordable shuttle service to food retailers outside of the neighborhood, and offering nutrition and cooking classes in neighborhood programming. In November 2014, a group of 15 project stakeholders were invited to a Ripple Effect Mapping discussion about the Fair Food Access Campaign�s impact in the community.
In 2013, Cycles for Change received funding from the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota to implement policy, systems, and environmental changes to improve the health of residents in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Cycles for Change has worked to increase leadership opportunities within its Community Partners Bike Library, a bike lending program aimed at increasing access to bikes and bike-related education for underserved communities. Cycles for Change has also built a network of individual and organizational leaders from underrepresented communities to influence policy and shape the built environment related to biking. In October 2014, a group of 18 project stakeholders were invited to a Ripple Effect Mapping discussion about the project’s impact in the community.
In 2013, Waite House received funding from the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota to implement policy, systems, and environmental changes to address health inequities experienced by low-income communities of color living in the Phillips neighborhood of Minneapolis. Three coalitions were established through the initiative: the 24th Street Urban Farm Coalition, the Fitness Coalition, and the Healthy Food Access Coalition. In November 2014, a group of 14 project stakeholders were invited to a Ripple Effect Mapping discussion about the project�s impact in the community. The discussion group was made up of members of each of the three coalitions, organizational partners, community residents, micro-grant recipients, and Waite House staff. The discussion was intended to not only provide the participants a chance to consider how successful the project has been in achieving its intended goals, but also to identify the indirect or unexpected project impacts. This document describes the key ideas from the discussion.
In 2013, the Rainbow Health Initiative (�RHI�) received funding from the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota through the Health Equity in Prevention (HEiP) initiative. Through their work, they are focusing on improving LGBTQ health by influencing policy and legislation, leveraging coalitions and networks to expand awareness, providing training and presentations to health professionals, and conducting a survey on health attitudes and individual health for LGBTQ people in Minnesota. In December 2014, a group of 18 project stakeholders were invited to a Ripple Effect Mapping discussion about RHI�s health equity work. The discussion was intended to not only provide the participants a chance to consider how successful the project has been in achieving its intended goals, but also to identify the indirect or unexpected project impacts. This document summarizes the key themes of the discussion.
Turn data into action. Our experts collaborate with you to evaluate programs, inform decisions, and drive lasting impact. Let’s work together to create stronger communities through meaningful insights. Contact us today to start a conversation that makes a difference.
items marked with an * are required